[Solved] Minimum 3 Pages Submit
Parts 1 and 2 have the same questions. However, you must answer with references and different writing, always addressing them objectively, as if you were different students. Similar responses in wording or references will not be accepted.
APA format
1) Minimum 6 pages (No word count per page)- Four paragraphs per page
You must strictly comply with the number of paragraphs requested per page.
The number of words in each paragraph should be similar
Part 1: minimum 3 pages
Part 2: minimum 3 pages
Submit 1 document per part
2)¨******APA norms
The number of words in each paragraph should be similar
Must be written in the 3 person
All paragraphs must be narrative and cited in the text- each paragraph
The writing must be coherent, using connectors or conjunctive to extend, add information, or contrast information.
Bulleted responses are not accepted
Don’t write in the first person
Do not use subtitles or titles
Don’t copy and paste the questions.
Answer the question objectively, do not make introductions to your answers, answer it when you start the paragraph
Submit 1 document per part
3)****************************** It will be verified by Turnitin (Identify the percentage of exact match of writing with any other resource on the internet and academic sources, including universities and data banks)
********************************It will be verified by SafeAssign (Identify the percentage of similarity of writing with any other resource on the internet and academic sources, including universities and data banks)
4) Minimum 3 references (APA format) per part not older than 5 years (Journals, books) (No websites)
All references must be consistent with the topic-purpose-focus of the parts. Different references are not allowed
5) Identify your answer with the numbers, according to the question. Start your answer on the same line, not the next
Example:
Q 1. Nursing is XXXXX
Q 2. Health is XXXX
Q3. Research is…………………………………………………. (a) The relationship between……… (b) EBI has to
6) You must name the files according to the part you are answering:
Example:
Part 1.doc
Part 2.doc
__________________________________________________________________________________
Parts 1 and 2 have the same questions. However, you must answer with references and different writing, always addressing them objectively, as if you were different students. Similar responses in wording or references will not be accepted.
The number of words in each paragraph should be similar
Part 1: Writing and Rhetoric
Four paragraphs per page. That is, must answer four questions per page
Reflect on the Stanford Study on Information Literacy” assignment (Check “Answers to Stanford Study file).
1. Explain one question you got wrong on the original assignment (Check File 1)
*****If you got everything correct
a. Describe one thing you hadn’t considered or one thing that you learned from reading the answers.
2. How do you feel about your information literacy at this point?
a. Are you surprised that you did as well as you did?
b. Did you expect to do better?
3. Do you feel that this experience will help you to increase your information literacy moving forward?
a. Why or why not?
4. What do you think this study says about how easy it is to spot “good” and “bad” sources?
5. Why might “good” sources be important, if we want to learn about what is happening in our society?
Watch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWw1b7r_1eo
6. According to the video. What are the foundational questions of information literacy?
7. Based on the video, what does research have to do with creativity?
8. Based on the video, how is research collaborative?
Pick any 2 ideas from the summary portion of the video (the portion after the “to sum up” slide)
9. Explain them in your own words.
a. Why are these central ideas to information literacy?
Think about the two activities together and what they demonstrate about your information literacy.
10. Which of the components in the video do you feel you need the most practice with?
a. Describe the component and why you don’t feel especially confident with this particular component.
11. What advice would you offer to other students that might want to improve their information literacy?
12. How do these activities affect how you think about what constitutes research in the 21st C/digital age?
Part 2: Writing and Rhetoric
Four paragraphs per page. That is, must answer four questions per page
Reflect on the Stanford Study on Information Literacy” assignment (Check “Answers to Stanford Study file).
1. Explain one question you got wrong on the original assignment (Check File 2)
*****If you got everything correct
a. Describe one thing you hadn’t considered or one thing that you learned from reading the answers.
2. How do you feel about your information literacy at this point?
a. Are you surprised that you did as well as you did?
b. Did you expect to do better?
3. Do you feel that this experience will help you to increase your information literacy moving forward?
a. Why or why not?
4. What do you think this study says about how easy it is to spot “good” and “bad” sources?
5. Why might “good” sources be important, if we want to learn about what is happening in our society?
Watch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWw1b7r_1eo
6. According to the video. What are the foundational questions of information literacy?
7. Based on the video, what does research have to do with creativity?
8. Based on the video, how is research collaborative?
Pick any 2 ideas from the summary portion of the video (the portion after the “to sum up” slide)
9. Explain them in your own words.
a. Why are these central ideas to information literacy?
Think about the two activities together and what they demonstrate about your information literacy.
10. Which of the components in the video do you feel you need the most practice with?
a. Describe the component and why you don’t feel especially confident with this particular component.
11. What advice would you offer to other students that might want to improve their information literacy?
12. How do these activities affect how you think about what constitutes research in the 21st C/digital age?